| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , NM5K wrote:
On 9/9/2012 7:36 PM, Channel Jumper wrote: I could have bought a good antenna analyzer last year for $85.00 and did not because a friend of mine wanted it and bought it for $65.00 I think they are overrated.. I've never needed or owned one so far.. I had a plain Two Meter Ringo back in the 70s, before they came out with the "Ranger" versions. It worked well, but gain claimed was probably DBi rather than DBd. I also have three generations of MFJ antenna analyzers. I don't know if they are overrated, but they are very handy. They save a lot of time compared to using a transmitter and SWR bridge to set up an antenna. As I understand it, they work just like the typical "reflectometer" SWR bridge where you set forward power to full scale and read reflected power on an SWR scale. Their VFO has its output held constant over the frequency range, calibrated for the equivalent of the SWR bridge's full scale setting. The early version Channel Jumper mentioned, probably had a frequency scale printed on the face. For critical settings, either a counter or a calibrated receiver would be needed. Later versions have a counter built-in, and the latest also displays antenna data on the LCD display. Fred K4DII |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Ringo Ranger ARX2 vs ARX2b | Antenna | |||
| Ringo Ranger II | Antenna | |||
| ARX2B Ringo Ranger | Antenna | |||
| WTB: Ringo Ranger II | Swap | |||
| Cushcraft Ringo Ranger II | Antenna | |||