| Home | 
| Search | 
| Today's Posts | 
| 
		 
			 
			#16  
			
			
			 
		
	   
			
			
		 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Dave wrote: 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	"Tdonaly" wrote: Cecil wrote, On the contrary, if one assumes same-cycle reflections, the reflection model works perfectly. Why wouldn't a 50 ohm source looking into a 100 ohm resistor suffer an immediate reflection (energy rejection)? :-) Why wouldn't it, indeed. if there are no components that introduce a time delay it would. All real-world components introduce a time delay. so no transmission lines allowed... hence no reflections. and you are back to a simple lumped resistor problem. RF energy travels at the speed of light. For the length of time it takes for the energy to reach the resistor and reflect back to the source, the source sees 50 ohms. That length of time is not zero. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----  | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		 | 
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| shorted 1/8 wave transmission line | Antenna | |||
| coax type traps | Antenna | |||
| vertical dipole? | Antenna | |||
| Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||