Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 09/11/2012 08:56 AM, Richard Fry wrote:
"J.B. Wood" wrote... the argument that the slant wire to the tower adversely modifies the antenna pattern doesn't seem to hold up in theory or practice. Linked below is a clip from "Radio Antenna Engineering" by Edmund Laport, which does show some pattern effects from shunt feeding a monopole. The FCC dislikes shunt fed radiators for AM broadcast stations (especially for directional arrays), as their skywave radiation patterns are inconsistent, and interference ratios are more difficult to predict. http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h8...d_Patterns.gif R. Fry Hello, and that identical diagram appears in my 1961 copy of Jasik's "Antenna Engineering Handbook" (McGraw-Hill Book Co.) in the chapter on medium-frequency broadcast antennas. In narrating the diagram (Fig 20-9) Jasik states, "Figure 20-9 shows typical variations in vertical pattern resulting from shunt feed. The radiated field from a shunt-fed tower is essentially the same as that from a series-fed tower of the same height." The diagram only shows measured data for a slant-wire shunt fed tower rather than a comparison of that with measured data from the same tower being series-fed. Apparently the FCC disagrees with Jasik. However I think the question from my original post has been addressed ("Because the FCC requires it"). Thanks, Richard. Sincerely and 73s from N4GGO, -- J. B. Wood e-mail: |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Shunt feed tower for Aircraft NDB beacon Help | Antenna | |||
Shunt fed vertical? | Antenna | |||
shunt fed AM Sticks | Broadcasting | |||
tower shunt feed for 160m | Antenna | |||
FL 2100B shunt value? | Boatanchors |