Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:34:20 -0500, seediq
wrote: I do not doubt your information here. However, it seems to conflict with my experiences working 75 meters. Ummm... is there a weather channel on 75 meters? My "cut the antenna length" test was intended for VHF, which is a very different beast from 75 meters. The big difference between VHF and HF is that HF turns the nearby earth, ground, water table, hills, buildings, fences, and neighbors into part of the antenna system. For VHF, once I get out of the near field region, most of that stuff can be ignored (unless it's also in the Fresnel Zone). I can elaborate more on this if you like, but I'm not an expert or seriously experience with land based HF antennas, just marine HF, which is yet a different beast. I'm stuck at home today with a foot problem. So, I get to sit at the computer instead of the workbench. I'll throw together a web page showing that cutting the antenna short does NOT reduce it's gain and efficiency very much (but does mangle the pattern and VSWR). Stay tuned. I work 75 each day using a 75 meter horizontal loop. I hear the same characters on each day. Often a newbie pops up with a poor signal. He is in the same area as "the gang" and yet his signal stinks. Almost invariably we ask him about his G5RV. "Gee guys how did you know I was using a G5RV?" Poor signals shows up every time. He is using a dipole that is way too short to resonate on 75 meters. I think they are 82 feet long. It seems to me if VSWR made little difference, then his 82 foot long dipole on 75 meters should work just fine. Not trying for a fight, just want an opinion about why we are hearing this effect. Can I pass on this right now? I have some definite opinions on HF antennas and the G5RV, which unfortunately I cannot substantiate with either experience or calculations. Rather than post erroneous information, I'll keep my foot in my mouth where it belongs. However, I can't resist giving you a clue as to what's different between an excessively short dipole and a real antenna. A hint is that unless the VSWR is outrageously high or the antenna was made from barbed wire, nearly 100.0% of the RF that is applied to it gets radiated in some direction. The some direction is the key. With a decent antenna, it's going in the right direction. With a not so wonderful antenna, it's going in useless directions, such as into the ground. I'll stop there before I get myself into trouble. Of course they are using tuners to make a match to their transceivers. I should also point out that one can always make things worse with an antenna tuner. Try the loss on 160m and 75m with this Java applet: http://fermi.la.asu.edu/w9cf/tuner/tuner.html Tweak the values of Q for the caps and inductors for a more realistic calculation. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|