Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old November 19th 13, 06:18 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 375
Default Noise susceptibility of a 2m yagi

Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , Jeff Liebermann
writes
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 22:26:53 +0000, Channel Jumper




This is the reason why television is horizontally polarized.


TV is horizontally polarized because the first FM operated in the
42-50 MHz region, where horizontally polarized antennas were more
common. A vertically polarized 30 MHz Yagi would be quite
impractical. The first TV stations were 44-50 MHz, and later moved to
50-56 MHz. Same problem... a vertical Yagi would be too big. There
are some other reasons if you want more detail.

In the UK, we longer use VHF (low-band and high-band) for TV (it's all
now on UHF). However, when we did, around 50% was vertical and (of
course) 50% was horizontal. The very first BBC transmitter (in London,
opened in 1936) was actually vertical, on 45MHz (they were rather big,
especially at ground level!), and remained so until VHF closed in the
late 80s. With only one or two exceptions, all high-power UHF is
horizontal, but quite a few lower-power fill-in transmitters are
vertical (to minimise mutual interference).


Here in the Netherlands, all TV and FM radio started out horizontally
polarized. The first transmitters were on VHF and newer ones on UHF,
but all horizontal.

However, at the "digital switchover", all transmitters were changed to
vertical polarization (at considerable effort and expense, swapping the
antennas in high towers using helicopters etc).

FM radio had been converted to vertical polarization a decade or so
before that. I think it was all done because it is so much easier
to have a vertically polarized omni antenna, and the general trend
is towards many small local transmitters which are of course received
from different directions, instead of/in addition to the existing network
that consisted of a small number of very high sites typically received
using yagi antennas.
Car radio antennas are also vertically polarized and are at a disadvantage
receiving horizontally polarized FM radio.
  #12   Report Post  
Old November 28th 13, 06:32 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2007
Posts: 20
Default Noise susceptibility of a 2m yagi

Rob wrote:


Car radio antennas are also vertically polarized and are at a disadvantage
receiving horizontally polarized FM radio.


Exactly why so many commercial transmitters are circularly polarized...
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Dualband 2m/70cm yagi and 6m yagi Andy in NJ Antenna 0 July 1st 04 05:38 AM
FS: Dualband 2m/70cm yagi and 6m yagi Andy in NJ Antenna 0 July 1st 04 05:38 AM
FS: Dualband 2m/70cm yagi and 6m yagi Andy in NJ Swap 0 July 1st 04 05:38 AM
WTB: HP/Agilent 346A (or B) Noise Source for HP 8970A Noise Figure Meter Carl R. Stevenson Homebrew 0 January 21st 04 04:20 AM
Automatic RF noise cancellation and audio noise measurement Dave Shrader Homebrew 35 August 11th 03 01:07 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017