Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, November 18, 2013 12:44:51 AM UTC-6, wrote:
But I'd be willing to bet he notices no lack of performance for it's number of elements and boom length when listening to other hams. One other note though... If he is showing signs of a decoupling problem when receiving, that means conditions are ripe for mayhem when transmitting. He may well have skewing of his pattern. It can skew upwards off the horizon, and you will see less gain at the lower angles you want, and it could probably skew the pattern as far as the heading in some cases. So improving the decoupling will help greatly both transmitting and receiving. With the old Ringo Ranger verticals, the difference between the original antenna with no decoupling, and the Ringo Ranger 2, which had a lower decoupling section, was several S units when tested on local signals at my QTH. Of course, the amount of skewing can be all over the map depending on the length of the un-decoupled feed line. The difference in performance is reciprocal between transmit and receive. IE: if I saw 3 db less signal on a particular station with no decoupling vs decoupled, they would see the same 3 db less signal from me on their receiver. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Dualband 2m/70cm yagi and 6m yagi | Antenna | |||
FS: Dualband 2m/70cm yagi and 6m yagi | Antenna | |||
FS: Dualband 2m/70cm yagi and 6m yagi | Swap | |||
WTB: HP/Agilent 346A (or B) Noise Source for HP 8970A Noise Figure Meter | Homebrew | |||
Automatic RF noise cancellation and audio noise measurement | Homebrew |