Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 15th 03, 09:01 PM
W5DXP
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Clark wrote:
You have a forward part from the transmitter,
a reverse part from the reflection.


We are talking about re-reflection FROM THE SOURCE!
The forward part and re-reflected part from the source
are coherent and traveling in the same direction so they
cannot be separated for measurement purposes. That's
why Bruene tried to determine the source impedance by
bouncing another separate signal off the source.
--
73, Cecil, W5DXP



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 29th 03 11:24 PM
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited Richard Clark Antenna 11 July 24th 03 07:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017