Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Clark wrote:
You have a forward part from the transmitter, a reverse part from the reflection. We are talking about re-reflection FROM THE SOURCE! The forward part and re-reflected part from the source are coherent and traveling in the same direction so they cannot be separated for measurement purposes. That's why Bruene tried to determine the source impedance by bouncing another separate signal off the source. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna |