Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Morrison wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 09:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Wassim wrote: Hello All, I have these questions that I hope you can help me with: 1) We are told that vertical antennas over salt water are highly effective. Why? This is particularly true of a monopole antenna, this type of antenna constructs an image of itself that appears to be reflected in the plane of the ground beneath it. Since salt water is more conductive than fresh water, this ground plane will allow a better, more complete image to be created and hence the antenna will radiate at a low angle. This tends to enhance signals over long paths as the RF signal has to refract from the ionosphere (for HF paths) fewer times and hence loses less energy. In addition since water is flat and by definition it's nearly always at sea level, there is a clear horizon and plenty of uncluttered space for the far field to be formed and launched or for the received signal to be captured. What would an ideal antenna to take advantage of this look like? Any vertical antenna will work well, naturally the longer this is the better (allowing for achieving the correct feed impedance) as this increases the antenna aperture (and hence gain) for a given frequency. 2) We are told that a yagi should be mounted as high up as possible. Is this really true? Why? What are the physical/electrical facts behind this phenomenon? The earth is curved, hence the radio horizon is increased by a ratio proportional to the square root of height above ground. Antennas work better when they are in unobstructed space, an antenna is simply a transducer that converts from the (typically) 50 ohm impedance of coaxial cable (or indeed any other impedance such as open wire or twin feeder) to the impedance of free space which is 377 ohms (it's proportional to the ratio of permittivity to permeability of free space). 3) When a yagi is mounted high above ground, it still performs better if the ground is pretty conductive. Why? This is not always true, it depends on various factors. In the case of plane earth propagation the direct and ground-reflected ray will go in and out of phase as the distance changes, what seems to be improved at a particular range can easily enter a deep fade and at the transition region the path loss increases from an R-squared loss to an R^4 loss. Thanks for helping me out. 73 Wassim WN6WJN HTH A yagi, or a dipole for that matter, mounted over ground has the pattern skewed upward by an amount that depends on the antenna height in wavelengths because of ground reflections. At heights less than around 1/2 wavelength, most of the energy goes to warming clouds, which is fine if you are trying to communicate with satellites and not ground stations. As the height increases the less the effect becomes. This can easily be seen by using EZNEC and looking at the vertical pattern of a dipole at various distances (in wavelengths) over ground. -- Jim Pennino |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|