Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jerry Stuckle wrote in news:lriogq$kba$1@dont-
email.me: In an FM transmitter, the amount of deviation is proportional to the amplitude of the modulating signal. That is, the louder the audio, the greater the deviation. Transmitter bandwidth cannot be greater than receiver bandwidth without loss of signal and distortion. Transmitter deviation can be less than receiver bandwidth; this only results in lower audio. This is why commercial FM receivers typically have a bandwidth of 170-180 kHz, when deviation is only 75 kHz. It makes things less critical. Ok, so a kind of 'headroom' exists then, but is there some agreeable degree of reduction on transmitter bandwidth to gain a significant reach in RF propagation and reduction in intrusion across the band, before the whole exercise fails due to poor SNR on output? My guess is that there may be, but the decision could be very different depending on whether speech or music (let alone stereo) is wanted. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WCBS-FM ralliers get rates boost | Broadcasting | |||
Funding Boost for Radio New Zealand International | Shortwave | |||
Advice Needed: How to boost signal on 2.4 ghz av unit | Equipment | |||
PrePaid Boost/Nextel Special | Swap | |||
FS PRE-PAID BOOST/NEXTEL | Swap |