| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"J.B. Wood" wrote in
: The small loop is assumed to lie in the x-y plane of an x-y-z orthogonal Cartesian coordinate system where theta and phi are the angles measured from the z-axis and x-axis, respectively. Just two axes? I've been asking on and off for advice on something... I was shown a nice design for a loop a few weeks ago, it was a helix, so in 3 axes. What advantage if any does that give over a loop in only two axes? As a guess I'll suggest it offers finer directional selectivity, but I'm hoping someone who really knows about this can tell me. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Spacecraft antennae | Homebrew | |||
| Antennae for 136kHz? | Antenna | |||
| Coaxial Collinear... To short or not to short | Antenna | |||
| Antennae base | Homebrew | |||
| Amateur Antennae | Antenna | |||