Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Well, how would you suggest he troubleshoot it?
I would drop some extra C in to determine if that's what's needed. What is it going to hurt? Otherwise all he has left, from what you have suggested, is to complain to the manufacturer. At the least, he should determine what, if anything, makes a difference before complaining. tom K0TAR Richard Clark wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 21:00:25 -0500, Tom Ring wrote: Unless what he wants to do is lower the frequency. Hi Tom, But that is NOT what he is trying to do. He simply wants it to work "as advertised." Everyone is re-inventing it to do what it was already designed to do. It already resonates at these frequencies, to add capacitance is very poor advice for any of several reasons. What John needs is to determine if it is broke, or if it is environment that is getting in the way. He is not asking for the antenna to tune outside of its characteristic range. The advice in the handbook suggests he open up the case and squash the feed loop to compensate for nearby interfering, metallic structures. This may solve the problem, but it is a ****-poor solution. If it were a general, preferrable condition, they would sell them all this way. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Magnetic field and loop antennas | Antenna | |||
Distance to Link Coupling in a Loop Antenna | Antenna | |||
Magnetic Loop Experiences | Antenna | |||
Varactor tuning on a magnetic loop | Antenna |