On 10/22/2014 11:15 AM, John S wrote:

What the hell are you seeking?

Drama

--

Rick

In message , rickman
writes
On 10/22/2014 11:15 AM, John S wrote:

What the hell are you seeking?

Drama

And, of course, confrontation.
--
Ian

"Ian Jackson" wrote in message
...
In message , rickman writes
On 10/22/2014 11:15 AM, John S wrote:

What the hell are you seeking?

Drama

And, of course, confrontation.

Untrue.

The confrontation is sought only by those who seek to respond
in a tendentious and abusive manner, such as John S and rickman
above.

On 10/22/2014 11:10 AM, gareth wrote:
"Ian Jackson" wrote in message
...
In message , rickman writes
On 10/22/2014 11:15 AM, John S wrote:

What the hell are you seeking?

Drama

And, of course, confrontation.

Untrue.

The confrontation is sought only by those who seek to respond
in a tendentious and abusive manner, such as John S and rickman
above.

In what way have I been abusive, Gareth? As for tendentious, it you who
have done so with most all of your original posts. It seems to me that
you are a lost and lonely soul and are seeking some attention. If you
wish to discuss technicalities of ham radio, I'm all for it. Can we
please be gentlemen about it? If not, I will never respond to you again.

On 22/10/14 17:42, John S wrote:
On 10/22/2014 11:10 AM, gareth wrote:
"Ian Jackson" wrote in message
...
In message , rickman
writes
On 10/22/2014 11:15 AM, John S wrote:

What the hell are you seeking?

Drama

And, of course, confrontation.

Untrue.

The confrontation is sought only by those who seek to respond
in a tendentious and abusive manner, such as John S and rickman
above.

In what way have I been abusive, Gareth? As for tendentious, it you who
have done so with most all of your original posts. It seems to me that
you are a lost and lonely soul and are seeking some attention. If you
wish to discuss technicalities of ham radio, I'm all for it. Can we
please be gentlemen about it? If not, I will never respond to you again.


If you look in the uk.r.a archive going back to 1997 or so, long before
I started posting, you will see he has been like this for decades. The
only changes have been his sock puppets (a long list) and his prime
targets.

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...

If you look in the uk.r.a archive going back to 1997 or so, long before I
started posting, you will see he has been like this for decades. The only
changes have been his sock puppets (a long list) and his prime targets.

You're the one who is hurling abuse, repeatedly, into this thread.

You need to learn that those who disagre with you are not being abusive
not are they a problem of any sort.

On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 19:08:11 +0100, gareth wrote:


You need to learn that those who disagre with you are not being abusive
not are they a problem of any sort.

Oh, the irony.

"gareth" wrote in news:m28rqd$mds$1@dont-
email.me:

You need to learn that those who disagre with you are not being abusive
not are they a problem of any sort.


So do you.

"John S" wrote in message
...

In what way have I been abusive, Gareth?

See below.

It seems to me that you are a lost and lonely soul and are seeking some
attention.

On 10/22/2014 1:06 PM, gareth wrote:
"John S" wrote in message
...

In what way have I been abusive, Gareth?

See below.

It seems to me that you are a lost and lonely soul and are seeking some
attention.

I don't believe that statement is considered abuse.