Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae,as previously discussed.
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:36:31 +0100, FranK Turner-Smith G3VKI wrote:
"Wayne" wrote in message ... "gareth" wrote in message ... Try this ... http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teachin...es/node94.html This is one of a series of lectures by a prof at Texas Uni. In fact, if you go right back to the home page of http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching, this leads to a most excellent revision of the necessary EM theories, and, briefly glancing thereto, the post grad stuff even exceeds my current interest and knowledge. I'm fairly sure now that this area is where I came across the governing formula that I alluded to recently in this NG when doing my own revision previously in 2005, although the URLs and lecture node numbers have changed since then. When I get time, I'll browse through the links. However, back to your original assertion that your theory has short antennas as being inefficient compared with longer antennas (I'm assuming you are talking half wave dipoles and such). If 10 watts is delivered to a short antenna, where does it go if it is not radiated just as well as 10 watts delivered to a long antenna? Dissipated as heat? Probably proportionately more will be lost as heat as a very short antenna will be a low impedance, therefore current, driven job and I sq*R losses within the antenna will play their part. Apart from those additional losses, it should radiate all that is left, ... I think. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Short Antennae | Antenna | |||
Fractal antennae? | Shortwave | |||
Looking for help regarding satellie antennae | Antenna | |||
Question on antennae | CB | |||
Homemade Antennae, help | Antenna |