Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lostgallifreyan wrote in
: concise is good, which that one is. I might be wrong about that. I really do need quick guides these days, my days of long reading are long gone, it physically hurts now even when I can do it at all. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lostgallifreyan wrote in
: Lostgallifreyan wrote in : concise is good, which that one is. I might be wrong about that. I really do need quick guides these days, my days of long reading are long gone, it physically hurts now even when I can do it at all. Well, it's a neatly made copy, but a huge tome, and I think maybe I got very lucky in hitting one paragraph by accident, paraphrsed so: "A rhombic antenna is only efficient when matched with the propogation medium for specific frequency". In opther words, a good plan for transmission efficiently in some direction at some frequency, but well beyond my scope for quick experimental listening efforts. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
Minimum Wage Myths? Typical Media Misinformation? | Shortwave | |||
Welcome to Legends 1680AM Radio | Shortwave | |||
Reality, "Slippery Facts, and Myths | Policy | |||
Jon Cunningham reposts old urban legends | Shortwave |