Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lostgallifreyan wrote:
wrote in : The log-periodic was several dB better, both transmit and receive, in part because there was no longer the 50% termination resistor loss. Thanks, I'll look at those a bit next time I can see well enough to read much. Even the name is new to me right now.. ![]() What I'm wondering is shy so much current discussion of whombic antennas at all. I try to follow the tech posts because short repeats of good info may be my best shot at absorbing it efficiently, but I'm not sure how rhombics got such repeated notice. Someone is attempting to make some sort of point by comparing apples and strawberries. The rhombic was a big deal in it's day back when huge, empty areas were readily available and better antennas had not yet been invented. -- Jim Pennino |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
Minimum Wage Myths? Typical Media Misinformation? | Shortwave | |||
Welcome to Legends 1680AM Radio | Shortwave | |||
Reality, "Slippery Facts, and Myths | Policy | |||
Jon Cunningham reposts old urban legends | Shortwave |