On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 3:13:11 PM UTC-5, rickman wrote:
On 10/28/2014 2:48 PM, No A1A required wrote:
On 28/10/2014 18:44, gareth wrote:
wrote in message
...
You bring it all on yourself from what I can see.

How can promotin technical discussion on the one hand, and criticising
infantile outbursts, such as are your, bring anything on?



Listening and taking things on board has never been one of your strong
points, has it?

I think these last few posts have proved my point. The problem is that
too many posters can't seem to ignore the posts they don't like.

--

Rick

The posts we don't like have nothing "zero, nada, zip, zilch" to
do with antennas. They are crossposts from UK groups where he has
hecklers. Why he thinks we are interested in his UK hecklers, beats
the crap out of me. ???
I have no issues with his actual antenna posts. Of course, I've
already mentioned all this more than once.

wrote in message
...
The posts we don't like have nothing "zero, nada, zip, zilch" to
do with antennas. They are crossposts from UK groups where he has
hecklers. Why he thinks we are interested in his UK hecklers, beats
the crap out of me. ???

Then your complaint is with the hecklers, but I note that you do not
criticise them when they appear only in this NG, reay being a disgraceful
example; disgraceful because he is a moderator of the Yahoo group RSCBTech.

Had you, and the others, spoken out in criticism of his unnecessary and
untechnical
personal attacks, then the situation of what you complain would not have
arisen
to the extent that it did.

I suspect that what has been happening is covered by the old adage, "My
enemy's
enemy is my friend", from several of you.

On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 5:20:47 PM UTC-5, gareth wrote:
wrote in message
...
The posts we don't like have nothing "zero, nada, zip, zilch" to
do with antennas. They are crossposts from UK groups where he has
hecklers. Why he thinks we are interested in his UK hecklers, beats
the crap out of me. ???

Then your complaint is with the hecklers, but I note that you do not
criticise them when they appear only in this NG, reay being a disgraceful
example; disgraceful because he is a moderator of the Yahoo group RSCBTech.

They are not the ones cross posting all the heckler threads. YOU ARE!



Had you, and the others, spoken out in criticism of his unnecessary and
untechnical
personal attacks, then the situation of what you complain would not have
arisen
to the extent that it did.

Why would I want to get involved with your UK hecklers? They aren't
heckling me. I wouldn't even be aware of them, except YOU keep
cross posting the crap over to here, where it doesn't belong.
Which then attracts them over here to further stir the doo-doo pot.



I suspect that what has been happening is covered by the old adage, "My
enemy's
enemy is my friend", from several of you.

I suspect you are confusing me with someone who gives a crap about you
and your UK social issues. :|

wrote in message
...
Why would I want to get involved with your UK hecklers?

Because they have come over here to pollute this NG and not via
crossposting, and it is very noticeable that you did not at any time
attack them for doing that.

On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:20:29 -0000, "gareth"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
The posts we don't like have nothing "zero, nada, zip, zilch" to
do with antennas. They are crossposts from UK groups where he has
hecklers. Why he thinks we are interested in his UK hecklers, beats
the crap out of me. ???

Then your complaint is with the hecklers, but I note that you do not
criticise them when they appear only in this NG, reay being a disgraceful
example; disgraceful because he is a moderator of the Yahoo group RSCBTech.



Where is the RSCBtech group?

I cannot find it on Yahoo...

On 10/29/2014 7:06 AM, Judith wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:20:29 -0000, "gareth"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
The posts we don't like have nothing "zero, nada, zip, zilch" to
do with antennas. They are crossposts from UK groups where he has
hecklers. Why he thinks we are interested in his UK hecklers, beats
the crap out of me. ???

Then your complaint is with the hecklers, but I note that you do not
criticise them when they appear only in this NG, reay being a disgraceful
example; disgraceful because he is a moderator of the Yahoo group RSCBTech.



Where is the RSCBtech group?

I cannot find it on Yahoo...


Judith, it's RSGBtech. RSCB is gareth's way of denigrating the group.
He doesn't like anything about the RSGB.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

On 10/28/2014 4:53 PM, wrote:
On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 3:13:11 PM UTC-5, rickman wrote:
On 10/28/2014 2:48 PM, No A1A required wrote:
On 28/10/2014 18:44, gareth wrote:
wrote in message
...
You bring it all on yourself from what I can see.

How can promotin technical discussion on the one hand, and criticising
infantile outbursts, such as are your, bring anything on?



Listening and taking things on board has never been one of your strong
points, has it?

I think these last few posts have proved my point. The problem is that
too many posters can't seem to ignore the posts they don't like.

--

Rick

The posts we don't like have nothing "zero, nada, zip, zilch" to
do with antennas. They are crossposts from UK groups where he has
hecklers. Why he thinks we are interested in his UK hecklers, beats
the crap out of me. ???
I have no issues with his actual antenna posts. Of course, I've
already mentioned all this more than once.

You clearly don't grasp what I am saying. You keep responding to his
crap posts. Even just complaining that his posts are crap is feeding
him and encouraging him to post more.

He replied to this same message I am replying to, then you replied to
his reply, on and on. Can't you see the pattern? It involves you as
much as him.

I'm going to refrain from commenting about this further. At this point
there is nothing I can add to the discussion. All of the points I have
made are very obvious to anyone who wishes to consider them. I am just
part of the problem and I will try to end that.

--

Rick