Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian Jackson wrote in
: at any location it could equally turn out to be almost anything between 'not a lot', and a lot more than 26dB - mainly depending on reflections. Good point. In optics reflections wreak merry hell with polarisation (often intentionally for good purpose) so I assume that it's the same with radio. Even so it has to beat putting both in same plane, and I'll use no more boost than will reduce local RF noise acceptably. Actually I have a bunch of PV panels and such out there on grounded mounts that any major reflections that occur won't make it into the flat, it's more likely there would be a few narrow opportunities for a direct signal to get past rather than many reflections getting here. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
The philosophy of short antennae | Antenna | |||
Reductio ad absurdum - short antennae do not radiate well | Antenna | |||
Short Antennae | Antenna | |||
Coaxial Collinear... To short or not to short | Antenna |