Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/30/2014 2:01 PM, Lostgallifreyan wrote:
rickman wrote in : The signal is PSK. My sight isn't very good. That's Psk, not Fsk... Phase? What did I miss. ![]() I've been hung up on the notion that this is an MSF time signal thing, and I just looked at the spec for the UK one which is a simple switch on/off of a carrier, so easy to detect efficiently. Yours is something else entirely, but what? You may need to lay a lot more cards down before you find an answer you can use, unless you hunt in the dark. (No reason not to, I usually do, on most things I do, as the net usually makes some light at greatest need). I have not studied the international time signals extensively, but I believe they all use AM. The US located beacon added PSK a few years back to make the signal easier to receive. The US is large enough that reception is poor in some of the east coast areas. I am east coast and would like to see just how much I can do to optimize the antenna to make this work well. -- Rick |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
rickman wrote in :
The US located beacon added PSK a few years back to make the signal easier to receive. I went Googlong after I wrote that last one. I'd have thought PSK would be harder to detect than AM. So much for what I know. ![]() wris****ches can detect the PSK signal too, so low power must have been done, with a small antenna too, but I don't knpow what they did so I'll leave it there. About op-amps, I just found it hard to let go of a favourite idea. ![]() many transistors though... Just one thought left that might be a kernel of a new idea: if you have a tiny resonant circuit at 60KHz, with high Q, then the change of phase ought to make some kind of detectable upset, a spike maybe, whose polarity you can use to determine mark or space in the signal. The combination of resonance and short spike duration might give you a usable combination of low power and detectable threshold. I'll stop there because I don't think I have anything you can use.. I'm interested in what you come up with though, especially if it avoids a large antenna. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/30/2014 3:20 PM, Lostgallifreyan wrote:
rickman wrote in : The US located beacon added PSK a few years back to make the signal easier to receive. I went Googlong after I wrote that last one. I'd have thought PSK would be harder to detect than AM. So much for what I know. ![]() wris****ches can detect the PSK signal too, so low power must have been done, with a small antenna too, but I don't knpow what they did so I'll leave it there. About op-amps, I just found it hard to let go of a favourite idea. ![]() many transistors though... Just one thought left that might be a kernel of a new idea: if you have a tiny resonant circuit at 60KHz, with high Q, then the change of phase ought to make some kind of detectable upset, a spike maybe, whose polarity you can use to determine mark or space in the signal. The combination of resonance and short spike duration might give you a usable combination of low power and detectable threshold. I'll stop there because I don't think I have anything you can use.. I'm interested in what you come up with though, especially if it avoids a large antenna. Define large... lol. I'm already looking at a 2 foot diameter which is just a wee bit too large for my wrist watch.. lol. Actually I really don't know how practical this is. The digital approach will depend greatly on pulling a very weak signal out of the noise. Not that the noise is in the signal on the antenna, but noise in terms of poor detection of such a weak signal. I will happily report back if/when I get any sort of results. -- Rick |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|