Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Short antennae, et al
gareth wrote:
I get the impression that I am trying to maintain a discussion with some whose knowledge and understanding is way below the level at which I am discussing, and that it is their limited grasp of technical matters that results in their infantile outbursts when the shaky premises of their (almost religious) beliefs are threatened. Rambling babble. As we all now have at our fingertips undreamed-of computer power than that existing when LLL first developed their NEC, perhaps the way forward for those with a genuine technical interest, (not CB-types with their off-the-shelf rigs) to produce their own piece-wise approximation software to rival EZ-NEC. (But I doubt that those who fire off abusive remarks would have such a capability) There is no such thing as EZ-NEC. NEC does not do "piece-wise approximation". Increased computer power means nothing more than the ability to solve complex problems in less time. The validity of the mathematics used by NEC engines was established a long time ago. -- Jim Pennino |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
short antennae | Antenna | |||
The philosophy of short antennae | Antenna | |||
Reductio ad absurdum - short antennae do not radiate well | Antenna | |||
Short Antennae | Antenna |