Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Write Off
"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message
... it didn't attract 1/10th the attention of Gareth's muddled science fiction antenna theory. No science fiction there, OM. Just because you don't understand the issues being raised is no excuse for you to join the class of babbling infants. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Write Off
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... I've seen this happen in normally unmoderated groups. Troll posts disruptive post, group owner gets complaints, puts troll on moderation list, troll is starved of attention, group recovers calm. True, troll is seething and ranting but no one cares. His anger becomes his own padded cell, with him bouncing around in it. Ignoring the troll has the same impact, as we've seen in uk.r.a, not to mention the impact of my ignoring Evans for extended periods. There has been no impact, for I continue to chastise you for being the unruly and disruptive attention seeker that you have always presented as. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Write Off
"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message
... I had no idea how to calculate the H field until he provided an example. And there is the ignorance declared, the ignorance that resulted in ad hominem comments elsewhere. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Write Off
"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message
... I tried a little experiment to confirm my suspicions. I followed up with a reply to one of Gareth's assertions that agreed with him, and backed it up with a few contrived examples. I wanted to see what would happen if someone actually agreed with him. Predictably, I was ignored by Gareth, which demonstrates that he's only interested in starting and continuing an arguement. You misunderstand what happened there. If you post so as to agree then no reply is appropriate. Did you want a pat on the head? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Write Off
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... That is what has happened in uk.r.a, there is a group (the usual suspects), who have similar motives to Evans and they act as 'cheer leaders' for him. Some of them have similar backgrounds, unsuccessful careers / long periods of unemployment, low technical ability, loners,... Brian ,M3OSN, Old Chap, that is a completely untrue mantra of yours, but the frequency with which you utter it suggests that perhaps you are suffering from some form of dementia? How about making a technical contribution to rra.antenna instead of just using it as a vehicle to vent your spleen on a daily basis? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Write Off
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... What has become your latest mantra over in uk.radio.amateur? Oh yes, here it is ... rude drivel snipped |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Write Off
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... rude drivel snipped |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Write Off
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... rude drivel snipped |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Write Off
On 11/5/2014 3:04 AM, Brian Reay wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote: I guess this group is just done for. I wouldn't say so so quickly; just get people to stop responding to Big G. I've seen this happen in normally unmoderated groups. Troll posts disruptive post, group owner gets complaints, puts troll on moderation list, troll is starved of attention, group recovers calm. True, troll is seething and ranting but no one cares. His anger becomes his own padded cell, with him bouncing around in it. But unmoderated groups have now "owner" and no "moderation lists", so it won't work here. Ignoring the troll has the same impact, as we've seen in uk.r.a, not to mention the impact of my ignoring Evans for extended periods. Yes, if only everyone would ignore him. -- Extend Sarah's Law, make sex offenders. wear. signs 24/7. BTW - your sig separator is broken. It should be hyphen-hyphen-space-newline. You're missing the space. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Write Off
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... He is posting to cause disruption wreck the group, which is what he has nearly done. If you all just blank him, don't respond to him, let him rant away to himself, he will eventually move on. He came here as he wasn't getting the attention he craves in uk.r.a, where he is being shunned. Are you sure that you're not exhibiting Freudian Projection and talking about yourself, considering the criticism that you yourself have just received in uk.radio.amateur? ... -----ooooo----- "Spike" wrote in message ... On 05/11/14 10:00, Brian Reay wrote: Well, I take it we can add HF receiver performance to the list of things you either won't discuss, can't discuss, get wrong after a bout of googling, or resort to ad homs. Previous similar topics were torpedo warheads and BC221 frequency meters. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
[tapr-announce] write now | Digital | |||
Somebody should write to the Delano tx... | Shortwave | |||
Write your own caption! | Shortwave | |||
Did Geo write this? | CB | |||
Would you like to write about your hobby for one of the UK's top websites? | General |