"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message
...
it didn't attract 1/10th the attention of Gareth's muddled science
fiction antenna theory.

No science fiction there, OM.

Just because you don't understand the issues being raised
is no excuse for you to join the class of babbling infants.

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
I've seen this happen in normally unmoderated groups. Troll posts
disruptive post, group owner gets complaints, puts troll
on moderation list, troll is starved of attention, group recovers calm.
True, troll is seething and ranting but no one cares. His anger becomes
his
own padded cell, with him bouncing around in it.
Ignoring the troll has the same impact, as we've seen in uk.r.a, not to
mention the impact of my ignoring Evans for extended periods.

There has been no impact, for I continue to chastise you for being the
unruly and disruptive attention seeker that you have always presented as.

"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message
...
I had no
idea how to calculate the H field until he provided an example.

And there is the ignorance declared, the ignorance that resulted
in ad hominem comments elsewhere.

"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message
...
I tried a little experiment to confirm my suspicions. I followed up
with a reply to one of Gareth's assertions that agreed with him, and
backed it up with a few contrived examples. I wanted to see what
would happen if someone actually agreed with him. Predictably, I was
ignored by Gareth, which demonstrates that he's only interested in
starting and continuing an arguement.

You misunderstand what happened there. If you post so as to agree then
no reply is appropriate.

Did you want a pat on the head?

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...

That is what has happened in uk.r.a, there is a group (the usual
suspects),
who
have similar motives to Evans and they act as 'cheer leaders' for him.
Some
of them
have similar backgrounds, unsuccessful careers / long periods of
unemployment, low
technical ability, loners,...

Brian ,M3OSN, Old Chap, that is a completely untrue mantra of yours, but
the frequency with which you utter it suggests that perhaps you are
suffering from
some form of dementia?

How about making a technical contribution to rra.antenna instead of just
using it as a vehicle to vent your spleen on a daily basis?

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...

What has become your latest mantra over in uk.radio.amateur?

Oh yes, here it is ...

rude drivel snipped

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...

rude drivel snipped

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...

rude drivel snipped

On 11/5/2014 3:04 AM, Brian Reay wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:


I guess this group is just done for.


I wouldn't say so so quickly; just get people to stop responding to Big G.


I've seen this happen in normally unmoderated groups. Troll posts
disruptive post, group owner gets complaints, puts troll
on moderation list, troll is starved of attention, group recovers calm.
True, troll is seething and ranting but no one cares. His anger becomes his
own padded cell, with him bouncing around in it.


But unmoderated groups have now "owner" and no "moderation lists", so it
won't work here.

Ignoring the troll has the same impact, as we've seen in uk.r.a, not to
mention the impact of my ignoring Evans for extended periods.


Yes, if only everyone would ignore him.


--
Extend Sarah's Law, make sex offenders. wear. signs 24/7.


BTW - your sig separator is broken. It should be
hyphen-hyphen-space-newline. You're missing the space.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
He is posting to cause disruption wreck the group, which is what he has
nearly done.
If you all just blank him, don't respond to him, let him rant away to
himself, he will eventually move on. He came here as he wasn't getting the
attention he craves in uk.r.a, where he is being shunned.

Are you sure that you're not exhibiting Freudian Projection and talking
about
yourself, considering the criticism that you yourself have just received in
uk.radio.amateur? ...

-----ooooo-----

"Spike" wrote in message
...
On 05/11/14 10:00, Brian Reay wrote:

Well, I take it we can add HF receiver performance to the list of things
you either won't discuss, can't discuss, get wrong after a bout of
googling, or resort to ad homs. Previous similar topics were torpedo
warheads and BC221 frequency meters.