"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...

What has become your latest mantra over in uk.radio.amateur?

Oh yes, here it is ...

rude drivel snipped

"rickman" wrote in message
...
I think this group can be written off as too low a signal to noise ratio.
One guy posts some drivel and a bunch of lamers start pounding on him about
it. The funny thing is they guy is posting just so he can argue with the
lamers.
Everyone can see what is going on, but this is what passes for fun in
r.r.a.a.

If this is your attempt to make an ad hominem attack on me, then you
are quite wrong, but perhaps you are trying to rationalise your own
abuse by claiming that I seek to be part of it?

If that is the case, then you need to grow up and take responsibility
for your own infantile outbursts.

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
He is posting to cause disruption wreck the group, which is what he has
nearly done.

You are the only person posting abuse, as above. You repeatedly dive into
these threads without any technical nous, only to post abuse.

Why do you behave like that, and so intensely of late? Is it because
you made a fool of yourself with respect to Maxwell's Equations and
are desperately creating a smokescreen?

If you all just blank him, don't respond to him, let him rant away to
himself, he will eventually move on. He came here as he wasn't getting the
attention he craves in uk.r.a, where he is being shunned.

Once again, you rant one of your mantras which are completely untrue.

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...

rude drivel snipped

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
He is posting to cause disruption wreck the group, which is what he has
nearly done.
If you all just blank him, don't respond to him, let him rant away to
himself, he will eventually move on. He came here as he wasn't getting the
attention he craves in uk.r.a, where he is being shunned.

Are you sure that you're not exhibiting Freudian Projection and talking
about
yourself, considering the criticism that you yourself have just received in
uk.radio.amateur? ...

-----ooooo-----

"Spike" wrote in message
...
On 05/11/14 10:00, Brian Reay wrote:

Well, I take it we can add HF receiver performance to the list of things
you either won't discuss, can't discuss, get wrong after a bout of
googling, or resort to ad homs. Previous similar topics were torpedo
warheads and BC221 frequency meters.