"Lostgallifreyan" wrote in message
. ..
Mike Tomlinson wrote in
news
He simply googled my name. I'm listed in the staff list on my
employer's website. He was well out of order trying to involve my
employer in the matter as I post using my name using my personal email
address from my own personal account, not on behalf of my employer or
using may of my employer's facilities. That's the sort of nasty piece
of work he is.


I agree, it;s out of order unless he can substantiate a claim against you,
and wanting to get back at you for a disagreement is not enough.

I never had a disagreement with him, his behaviour was a one-sided effluent
of grossly offensive remarks directed at me; remarks that raised concern
that he would be dangerous as a role model to young people, a concern that
continues to this day from his nasty posts to usenet.

He is a hypocrite if he thinks that he can use the Internet to make grossly
offensive remarks and not then expect the Internet to be used to
assert a reply.

On Sun, 09 Nov 2014 16:48:04 +0000, gareth wrote:


He is a hypocrite if he thinks that he can use the Internet to make
grossly offensive remarks and not then expect the Internet to be used to
assert a reply.

Life was so much simpler when messages were sent wrapped around the
shafts of arrows. Exercising your right of reply might have bean tricky,
though.

Radiohead70 wrote in news:m3o6bo$41b$1@dont-
email.me:

Life was so much simpler when messages were sent wrapped around the
shafts of arrows. Exercising your right of reply might have bean tricky,
though.


Nice. The Spirit of Monty Python alive and well.