Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jerry Stuckle wrote in news:m3rq68$d6t$2@dont-
email.me: You're grasping at straws. Just the fact something was accessible to the public does not necessarily mean it's not patentable in the United States. Not any longer, anyway - as a couple of good patent attorneys have recently told me. Any chance you can ask them again? Please.. if they can point out the exact bit of law they think is weak, that will help a lot. They may well be hot stuff, but even the best may be in error, and if they don't state a specific detail of weakness, we can't examine it. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
[tapr-announce] write now | Digital | |||
Somebody should write to the Delano tx... | Shortwave | |||
Write your own caption! | Shortwave | |||
Did Geo write this? | CB | |||
Would you like to write about your hobby for one of the UK's top websites? | General |