Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Write Off
Jerry Stuckle wrote in news:m3rq68$d6t$2@dont-
email.me: You're grasping at straws. Just the fact something was accessible to the public does not necessarily mean it's not patentable in the United States. Not any longer, anyway - as a couple of good patent attorneys have recently told me. Any chance you can ask them again? Please.. if they can point out the exact bit of law they think is weak, that will help a lot. They may well be hot stuff, but even the best may be in error, and if they don't state a specific detail of weakness, we can't examine it. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Write Off
On 11/11/2014 6:39 AM, Lostgallifreyan wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote in news:m3rq68$d6t$2@dont- email.me: You're grasping at straws. Just the fact something was accessible to the public does not necessarily mean it's not patentable in the United States. Not any longer, anyway - as a couple of good patent attorneys have recently told me. Any chance you can ask them again? Please.. if they can point out the exact bit of law they think is weak, that will help a lot. They may well be hot stuff, but even the best may be in error, and if they don't state a specific detail of weakness, we can't examine it. I suggest you ask your own patent attorney. I'm not going to try to discuss this with you; I've learned. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
[tapr-announce] write now | Digital | |||
Somebody should write to the Delano tx... | Shortwave | |||
Write your own caption! | Shortwave | |||
Did Geo write this? | CB | |||
Would you like to write about your hobby for one of the UK's top websites? | General |