| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
November 22nd 14, 01:22 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
Dipoles, why height matters
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/21/2014 5:22 PM, Wayne wrote: snip Along the lines of a "testimonial"... I once lived in the center of a state that had an active 75 meter net. At one point I was asked to be one of the net control stations because of my consistent strong signals within the net. The secret? A 75 meter dipole at 20 feet with 100 watts. On longer paths, of course, the "big boys" kicked my butt big time. Gee, according to jimp, your antenna should have "sucked". Which shows you are incapapble of understanding the difference between NVIS propagation and skywave propagation or anything else that I wrote. If you did understand it, you would know that what he said is TOTALLY consistant with what I wrote. But then he isn't interested in facts that contradict his fantasies. But then your aren't interested in facts that contradict your fantasies. -- Jim Pennino |
|
#3
November 22nd 14, 01:58 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dipoles, why height matters
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/21/2014 8:22 PM, wrote: Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 11/21/2014 5:22 PM, Wayne wrote: snip Along the lines of a "testimonial"... I once lived in the center of a state that had an active 75 meter net. At one point I was asked to be one of the net control stations because of my consistent strong signals within the net. The secret? A 75 meter dipole at 20 feet with 100 watts. On longer paths, of course, the "big boys" kicked my butt big time. Gee, according to jimp, your antenna should have "sucked". Which shows you are incapapble of understanding the difference between NVIS propagation and skywave propagation or anything else that I wrote. Nope, I understand them a lot better than you do. And his comments had NOTHING to do with what you said. According to you, his antenna "sucked". Period. No qualification. My god you are delusional when you are raging. If you did understand it, you would know that what he said is TOTALLY consistant with what I wrote. And once again you are trying to weasel out of what you said. Just like a troll. My god you are delusional when you are raging. -- Jim Pennino |
|
#4
November 22nd 14, 11:04 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dipoles, why height matters
On 11/21/2014 8:58 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 11/21/2014 8:22 PM, wrote: Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 11/21/2014 5:22 PM, Wayne wrote: snip Along the lines of a "testimonial"... I once lived in the center of a state that had an active 75 meter net. At one point I was asked to be one of the net control stations because of my consistent strong signals within the net. The secret? A 75 meter dipole at 20 feet with 100 watts. On longer paths, of course, the "big boys" kicked my butt big time. Gee, according to jimp, your antenna should have "sucked". Which shows you are incapapble of understanding the difference between NVIS propagation and skywave propagation or anything else that I wrote. Nope, I understand them a lot better than you do. And his comments had NOTHING to do with what you said. According to you, his antenna "sucked". Period. No qualification. My god you are delusional when you are raging. Read your own words. YOU said it - not me. If you did understand it, you would know that what he said is TOTALLY consistant with what I wrote. And once again you are trying to weasel out of what you said. Just like a troll. My god you are delusional when you are raging. Once again you refuse to discuss the topic. Instead of admitting you are wrong, you are making ad hominim attacks. How like a troll. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
|
#5
November 22nd 14, 06:09 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dipoles, why height matters
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/21/2014 8:58 PM, wrote: Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 11/21/2014 8:22 PM, wrote: Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 11/21/2014 5:22 PM, Wayne wrote: snip Along the lines of a "testimonial"... I once lived in the center of a state that had an active 75 meter net. At one point I was asked to be one of the net control stations because of my consistent strong signals within the net. The secret? A 75 meter dipole at 20 feet with 100 watts. On longer paths, of course, the "big boys" kicked my butt big time. Gee, according to jimp, your antenna should have "sucked". Which shows you are incapapble of understanding the difference between NVIS propagation and skywave propagation or anything else that I wrote. Nope, I understand them a lot better than you do. And his comments had NOTHING to do with what you said. According to you, his antenna "sucked". Period. No qualification. My god you are delusional when you are raging. Read your own words. YOU said it - not me. If you did understand it, you would know that what he said is TOTALLY consistant with what I wrote. And once again you are trying to weasel out of what you said. Just like a troll. My god you are delusional when you are raging. Once again you refuse to discuss the topic. Instead of admitting you are wrong, you are making ad hominim attacks. How like a troll. My god you are delusional when you are raging. -- Jim Pennino |
|
#6
November 22nd 14, 08:48 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dipoles, why height matters
On 11/22/2014 1:09 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 11/21/2014 8:58 PM, wrote: Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 11/21/2014 8:22 PM, wrote: Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 11/21/2014 5:22 PM, Wayne wrote: snip Along the lines of a "testimonial"... I once lived in the center of a state that had an active 75 meter net. At one point I was asked to be one of the net control stations because of my consistent strong signals within the net. The secret? A 75 meter dipole at 20 feet with 100 watts. On longer paths, of course, the "big boys" kicked my butt big time. Gee, according to jimp, your antenna should have "sucked". Which shows you are incapapble of understanding the difference between NVIS propagation and skywave propagation or anything else that I wrote. Nope, I understand them a lot better than you do. And his comments had NOTHING to do with what you said. According to you, his antenna "sucked". Period. No qualification. My god you are delusional when you are raging. Read your own words. YOU said it - not me. If you did understand it, you would know that what he said is TOTALLY consistant with what I wrote. And once again you are trying to weasel out of what you said. Just like a troll. My god you are delusional when you are raging. Once again you refuse to discuss the topic. Instead of admitting you are wrong, you are making ad hominim attacks. How like a troll. My god you are delusional when you are raging. Once again you refuse to discuss the topic. Instead of admitting you are wrong, you are making ad hominim attacks. How like a troll. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
|
#7
November 22nd 14, 10:04 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dipoles, why height matters
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
snip Once again you refuse to discuss the topic. Instead of admitting you are wrong, you are making ad hominim attacks. How like a troll. The only topic to discuss when you go off into one of your delusional rages and say I said things completly opposite to what I did say would be where you could get professional help for your raging delusions. -- Jim Pennino |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| All tax related matters and International tax matters. | Boatanchors | |||
| All tax related matters and International tax matters. | Scanner | |||
| Israel's Identity: It Matters! | Shortwave | |||
| ISRAEL'S IDENTITY: IT MATTERS! | Shortwave | |||
| Antenna height vs roof height | Antenna | |||
Hybrid Mode
