Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/23/2014 4:22 PM, Percy Picacity wrote:
On 2014-11-23 20:54:25 +0000, Jerry Stuckle said: All I said was your comment about an 80 meter dipole under 100' off the ground sucks is wrong. And I supplied the proof for it. He's already agreed with you that that was not an accurate assessment and didn't represent his overall judgement, just a careless reiteration of what someone else said; and that was about 4000 posts ago! No, he has never admitted that. He has tried to explain it away - but never said his assessment was inaccurate. In fact, he has repeatedly argued the opposite. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
All tax related matters and International tax matters. | Boatanchors | |||
All tax related matters and International tax matters. | Scanner | |||
Israel's Identity: It Matters! | Shortwave | |||
ISRAEL'S IDENTITY: IT MATTERS! | Shortwave | |||
Antenna height vs roof height | Antenna |