Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 19th 04, 02:28 PM
Vito
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ed Price" wrote
However, the 70's cars were notorious for trying to reduce exhaust

emissions
with pneumatics, thermal delays, and other non-electronic systems. Those
systems created balky, stall-prone engines, so we need to move the date

back
to about 1970.


Second that! My 66 Fairlane with a 289 V8 got 17-21MPG. My 68
factory-special GTO would just lift the left front tire off the ground
coming off the line, and charge past 120MPH, but got 12 MPG. My buddy's
1972 340 Duster was slower than the Fairlane and barely got 12 MPG. The 72
made less nitrious oxide than the goat, which was good for LA smog, but made
more half-burned hydrocarbons that the rest of the country didn't need.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017