| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#4
July 15th 04, 06:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 04:46:28 GMT, Ken wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 21:17:22 GMT, wrote: It would appear safest to lengthen the wire in the ringer/receiver to around 7" but I do not understand why the manufacturer just didn't make it longer in the first place. To keep your visitors from ringing your neighbors' bells? How would increasing the size of a receive antenna increase propagation from the remote? No one said it would. You should read more slowly. If you had said "To keep your neighbors' buttons from ringing your bells," that might have been valid. No, I was responding to the bit about "why the manufacturer just didn't make it longer in the first place" -- the manufacturer intended that the receive range -- on all units -- be short enough to avoid this problem. If he made it longer, everyone might ring bells for a couple of houses on either side, as well as their own. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Wireless network | Antenna | |||
| Wireless lan | Antenna | |||
| Extending range of wireless motion sensor | Antenna | |||
| Extend range of wireless motion sensor | Antenna | |||
| Indoor Wireless Cable TV Transmission | Antenna | |||
Threaded Mode
