Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 3rd 15, 06:24 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2012
Posts: 989
Default "Bal uhn" or "bayl uhn"?

On 8/3/2015 4:49 AM, Jeff wrote:

This is one of those cases where you have forgotten the details and
underlying premises. A Faraday cage can't stop currents from flowing
through the "cage". It stops fields from penetrating the cage by action
of the resulting currents in the cage. Your car is largely a Faraday
cage but you can still be electrocuted if a live wire is in contact with
the chassis and you touch it while inside. There can be a high
potential across different parts of the car from the current and that
current can pass through you if you touch the cage.


If there are high different potentials between different parts of the
car it is not a Faraday Cage.


You are applying some rule you learned without understanding it. By
ohms law there will be potential differences around the Faraday cage.


Also assuming that it is a Faraday cage then touching it whist the cage
is connected to a live conductor will not cause a shock, as everything
is at the same potential.


Only true if the conductor is perfect with no resistance.

--

Rick
  #2   Report Post  
Old August 3rd 15, 07:39 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,898
Default "Bal uhn" or "bayl uhn"?

rickman wrote:
On 8/3/2015 4:49 AM, Jeff wrote:

This is one of those cases where you have forgotten the details and
underlying premises. A Faraday cage can't stop currents from flowing
through the "cage". It stops fields from penetrating the cage by action
of the resulting currents in the cage. Your car is largely a Faraday
cage but you can still be electrocuted if a live wire is in contact with
the chassis and you touch it while inside. There can be a high
potential across different parts of the car from the current and that
current can pass through you if you touch the cage.


If there are high different potentials between different parts of the
car it is not a Faraday Cage.


You are applying some rule you learned without understanding it. By
ohms law there will be potential differences around the Faraday cage.


Also assuming that it is a Faraday cage then touching it whist the cage
is connected to a live conductor will not cause a shock, as everything
is at the same potential.


Only true if the conductor is perfect with no resistance.


Pedantically true but practically irrelevant; for a real world cage the
voltage differences will be small fractions of a volt.


--
Jim Pennino
  #3   Report Post  
Old August 3rd 15, 08:11 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2012
Posts: 989
Default "Bal uhn" or "bayl uhn"?

On 8/3/2015 1:39 PM, wrote:
rickman wrote:
On 8/3/2015 4:49 AM, Jeff wrote:

This is one of those cases where you have forgotten the details and
underlying premises. A Faraday cage can't stop currents from flowing
through the "cage". It stops fields from penetrating the cage by action
of the resulting currents in the cage. Your car is largely a Faraday
cage but you can still be electrocuted if a live wire is in contact with
the chassis and you touch it while inside. There can be a high
potential across different parts of the car from the current and that
current can pass through you if you touch the cage.

If there are high different potentials between different parts of the
car it is not a Faraday Cage.


You are applying some rule you learned without understanding it. By
ohms law there will be potential differences around the Faraday cage.


Also assuming that it is a Faraday cage then touching it whist the cage
is connected to a live conductor will not cause a shock, as everything
is at the same potential.


Only true if the conductor is perfect with no resistance.


Pedantically true but practically irrelevant; for a real world cage the
voltage differences will be small fractions of a volt.


"Your car is largely a Faraday cage but you can still be electrocuted if
a live wire is in contact with the chassis and you touch it while inside."

Why don't we conduct an experiment. You are saying it will only be a
small fraction of a volt, we'll put you in the car. lol

--

Rick
  #4   Report Post  
Old August 3rd 15, 08:25 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,898
Default "Bal uhn" or "bayl uhn"?

rickman wrote:
On 8/3/2015 1:39 PM, wrote:
rickman wrote:
On 8/3/2015 4:49 AM, Jeff wrote:

This is one of those cases where you have forgotten the details and
underlying premises. A Faraday cage can't stop currents from flowing
through the "cage". It stops fields from penetrating the cage by action
of the resulting currents in the cage. Your car is largely a Faraday
cage but you can still be electrocuted if a live wire is in contact with
the chassis and you touch it while inside. There can be a high
potential across different parts of the car from the current and that
current can pass through you if you touch the cage.

If there are high different potentials between different parts of the
car it is not a Faraday Cage.

You are applying some rule you learned without understanding it. By
ohms law there will be potential differences around the Faraday cage.


Also assuming that it is a Faraday cage then touching it whist the cage
is connected to a live conductor will not cause a shock, as everything
is at the same potential.

Only true if the conductor is perfect with no resistance.


Pedantically true but practically irrelevant; for a real world cage the
voltage differences will be small fractions of a volt.


"Your car is largely a Faraday cage but you can still be electrocuted if
a live wire is in contact with the chassis and you touch it while inside."

Why don't we conduct an experiment. You are saying it will only be a
small fraction of a volt, we'll put you in the car. lol


I notice you did not address what I actually wrote.

Yet another red herring from the red herring master; I would never call
a car a Faraday cage for a number of reasons.


--
Jim Pennino
  #5   Report Post  
Old August 3rd 15, 11:42 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2012
Posts: 989
Default "Bal uhn" or "bayl uhn"?

On 8/3/2015 2:25 PM, wrote:
rickman wrote:
On 8/3/2015 1:39 PM,
wrote:
rickman wrote:
On 8/3/2015 4:49 AM, Jeff wrote:

This is one of those cases where you have forgotten the details and
underlying premises. A Faraday cage can't stop currents from flowing
through the "cage". It stops fields from penetrating the cage by action
of the resulting currents in the cage. Your car is largely a Faraday
cage but you can still be electrocuted if a live wire is in contact with
the chassis and you touch it while inside. There can be a high
potential across different parts of the car from the current and that
current can pass through you if you touch the cage.

If there are high different potentials between different parts of the
car it is not a Faraday Cage.

You are applying some rule you learned without understanding it. By
ohms law there will be potential differences around the Faraday cage.


Also assuming that it is a Faraday cage then touching it whist the cage
is connected to a live conductor will not cause a shock, as everything
is at the same potential.

Only true if the conductor is perfect with no resistance.

Pedantically true but practically irrelevant; for a real world cage the
voltage differences will be small fractions of a volt.


"Your car is largely a Faraday cage but you can still be electrocuted if
a live wire is in contact with the chassis and you touch it while inside."

Why don't we conduct an experiment. You are saying it will only be a
small fraction of a volt, we'll put you in the car. lol


I notice you did not address what I actually wrote.

Yet another red herring from the red herring master; I would never call
a car a Faraday cage for a number of reasons.


Neither is a coax shield.

--

Rick


  #6   Report Post  
Old August 4th 15, 12:27 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,898
Default "Bal uhn" or "bayl uhn"?

rickman wrote:
On 8/3/2015 2:25 PM, wrote:
rickman wrote:
On 8/3/2015 1:39 PM,
wrote:
rickman wrote:
On 8/3/2015 4:49 AM, Jeff wrote:

This is one of those cases where you have forgotten the details and
underlying premises. A Faraday cage can't stop currents from flowing
through the "cage". It stops fields from penetrating the cage by action
of the resulting currents in the cage. Your car is largely a Faraday
cage but you can still be electrocuted if a live wire is in contact with
the chassis and you touch it while inside. There can be a high
potential across different parts of the car from the current and that
current can pass through you if you touch the cage.

If there are high different potentials between different parts of the
car it is not a Faraday Cage.

You are applying some rule you learned without understanding it. By
ohms law there will be potential differences around the Faraday cage.


Also assuming that it is a Faraday cage then touching it whist the cage
is connected to a live conductor will not cause a shock, as everything
is at the same potential.

Only true if the conductor is perfect with no resistance.

Pedantically true but practically irrelevant; for a real world cage the
voltage differences will be small fractions of a volt.

"Your car is largely a Faraday cage but you can still be electrocuted if
a live wire is in contact with the chassis and you touch it while inside."

Why don't we conduct an experiment. You are saying it will only be a
small fraction of a volt, we'll put you in the car. lol


I notice you did not address what I actually wrote.

Yet another red herring from the red herring master; I would never call
a car a Faraday cage for a number of reasons.


Neither is a coax shield.


I notice you still did not address what I actually wrote.

Yet another red herring from the red herring master; I would never call
a coax shield a Faraday cage.




--
Jim Pennino
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Coax question - are the "generic" versions of LMR-400 and LMR-400 Ultraflex as good as the "name brand" or is it not worth the savings? Bob[_32_] Antenna 11 July 2nd 16 03:35 AM
For the Newbie Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) : Check-Out "PopularCommunications" and "Monitoring Times" Magazines RHF Shortwave 0 February 1st 08 01:26 PM
"Sirius wins "Fastest Growing Company" in Deloitte's 2007 Technology Fast 500" [email protected] Shortwave 15 October 28th 07 11:02 AM
"Sirius wins "Fastest Growing Company" in Deloitte's 2007 Technology Fast 500" [email protected] Shortwave 0 October 24th 07 01:48 AM
"meltdown in progress"..."is amy fireproof"...The Actions Of A "Man" With Three College Degrees? K4YZ Policy 6 August 29th 06 12:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017