Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
With time, it is clear that the magnitude of the claimed novelty, versus the
reality, is an unfortunate case of lack of information --this is my opinion-- based upon factual errors stated, and said, by Rob. He most certainly is not "a jerk". Seems like a sincere and dedicated fellow who has worked very hard on a very challenging problem. I regret that he has not made a sufficient case regarding novelty nor efficiency nor widebandedness: again--this is my opinion. There is little that may be gleaned, moving forward, in the realm of antenna science: spurts in the past decade have, at least, milked the basic science dry. There is still fertile ground for application, a rich and satisfying endeavor upon which many here focus with rigour. 73, Chip N1IR |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
HF Vertical design(s) | Antenna | |||
Poor vertical performance on metal sheet roof - comments? | Antenna |