With time, it is clear that the magnitude of the claimed novelty, versus the
reality, is an unfortunate case of lack of information --this is my opinion--
based upon factual errors stated, and said, by Rob. He most certainly is not "a
jerk". Seems like a sincere and dedicated fellow who has worked very hard on a
very challenging problem. I regret that he has not made a sufficient case
regarding novelty nor efficiency nor widebandedness: again--this is my opinion.

There is little that may be gleaned, moving forward, in the realm of antenna
science: spurts in the past decade have, at least, milked the basic science
dry. There is still fertile ground for application, a rich and satisfying
endeavor upon which many here focus with rigour.

73,
Chip N1IR

With time, it is clear that the magnitude of the claimed novelty, versus the
reality, is an unfortunate case of lack of information ... based upon factual
errors stated... He most certainly is not "a
jerk".


I believe his jerkiness is confirmed by his silly threats regarding
patent infringement.

We've seen it before.