| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Roy if I have violated Newtons laws please inform me were I did that . I
admit you did not say that I did , but surely you would not made a comment that was unrelated..............would you ? I am only presenting a point of view, not to assure to all that I am correct but to ascertain the error of that logic and certainly not to advance the theory of perpetual motion even tho you may view me as an idiot to ask such a silly question on this forum. If one is unsure even on the most simple of things then he is doomed to remain simple because he exposed his underbelly for target practice.by asking for assistance Art "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... The law of conservation of energy is a touchstone you should always use as a reality check for whatever theory you have. If your theory leads to a conclusion that contradicts that law, then either your theory is wrong or there was an error in some step along the way from the theory to the conclusion. Or you belong to the perpetual motion machine crowd. Roy Lewallen, W7EL wrote: Points raised noticed and placed in my thoughts bag to digest. With respect to radiation I revolve solidly about accedleratio during a point in time, accelleration required to negotiat a turn which even at constant speed create acceleration and lastly arangements that create more current without the loss of energy of which I see as coupling. Since I am pretty much self taught because of a loss of memory onslaught it is easy to build on sand without a true geoligists report which is not available when one works alone. Thus I am curious as to where exactly I have gone astray by not having a thorough education in R.F. workings. So if there is cycliic increases of radiation per unit length then I see the same unit length in spiral form introduces an addition vector of forces that I translate into radiation, I have a history of not being able to adequately explaining my thought so hopefully the above will assist in explaining my thought processes even tho they may seem totally rediculus to those edu8cated in the field of whom I ask for correction. From how I see it I have not viotated any laws with this thinking but now is the time for me to put things in there proper place.and accepted without rancour. Regards Art |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Transmission line radiation | Antenna | |||
| Cardiod radiation pattern - 70 cm phased vertical dipoles | Antenna | |||
| Radiation Resistance & Efficiency | Antenna | |||
| Incoming radiation angles | Antenna | |||
| Measuring radiation resistance | Antenna | |||