LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #22   Report Post  
Old August 17th 04, 02:13 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Hal Rosser" wrote in message
...
Ok, so the acceleration is in the phase-shifting between the adjacent

coils
?
If I interpret that correctly, then its not a 'real' acceleration, but a
simulated acceleration - much like using pulsating DC to generate

simulated
AC.

Well radiation is certainly a series of "pulses" as the radiation consists
of enclosed
waves and yet the speed of generation is constant and only the constituents
of total energy
undergo change. This is how I visualise creation of radiation on a straight
element.
Now we come to a element that is circular. I still see the generation
of radiation as generated on a strraight radiator but I now see that the
radiation has a component
as shown by a added vector as in centrifugal force which because the
radiator is circular
is constant. Now I am not proposing a new theory I am asking for a an
explanation why this is fallacious
Art

If you could describe it in terms a normal dummy like myself could
understand or at least draw a better picture, your theory may be taken

more
seriously.
You say Roy's word is not good enough - But Roy has demonstrated his
expertise in this area time and time again.
I come here to learn from folks like Roy - and to inject some of my own
thoughts from time to time.



Don't we all ? But sometimes Roy's words of wisdom does not satisfy the
questioner
asks for the underpinnings of the statement. Roy feels an answer from him is
all that is required
as in the word of God and he is not interested in trivialities and may even
leave the group for a while

You come to the group asking for comments - and you got them.
You did not speak in terms of technical details - so a reply using

technical
details may not be deserved.


There is no disgrace in asking questions (like you said) - but rejecting
expert opinions can be seen as a disgrace in some instances.



I agree but a answer that states it does not obey natures laws if one cannot
supply the illustration on how it occurs
so any request for backup can easily be seen as rejection by some since the
words of God have been given

" wrote in

message
news:dJeUc.269797$%_6.33856@attbi_s01...
Hi Hal, nice to meet you

delete What I have is not really a prposition or a legitimate theory, it
is just
so



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Transmission line radiation Ron Antenna 16 April 26th 04 01:03 AM
Cardiod radiation pattern - 70 cm phased vertical dipoles Ray Gaschk Antenna 3 February 21st 04 12:26 AM
Radiation Resistance & Efficiency Reg Edwards Antenna 23 January 10th 04 11:56 AM
Incoming radiation angles Art Unwin KB9MZ Antenna 33 January 5th 04 11:11 PM
Measuring radiation resistance Reg Edwards Antenna 11 December 13th 03 12:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017