On 9/11/2015 3:11 AM, AndyW wrote:
On 10/09/2015 21:47, rickman wrote:
This group was fairly quiet, even dead, for some time until Gareth made
a few posts designed to stimulate idiocy. I don't know what the man may
know about radio science, but he is a master puppeteer.


In U.R.A. there was a move to just stop replying to his posts,
particularly the baited hooks and it killed a lot of the noise in the
group.
Some of the questions start off interesting but pretty soon descend into
name-calling or cyclical arguements and it is time to leave the thread.
Some of his threads are heading that way already.

It's not just him. He lives for the controversy obviously. But others
here live to give it to him. Trolls feeding trolls. Good luck getting
the ones who reply to agree to ignore him. You'd have better luck
getting him to ignore them!

--

Rick

"rickman" wrote in message
...
On 9/11/2015 3:11 AM, AndyW wrote:
On 10/09/2015 21:47, rickman wrote:
This group was fairly quiet, even dead, for some time until Gareth made
a few posts designed to stimulate idiocy. I don't know what the man may
know about radio science, but he is a master puppeteer.
In U.R.A. there was a move to just stop replying to his posts,
particularly the baited hooks and it killed a lot of the noise in the
group.
Some of the questions start off interesting but pretty soon descend into
name-calling or cyclical arguements and it is time to leave the thread.
Some of his threads are heading that way already.
It's not just him. He lives for the controversy obviously. But others
here live to give it to him. Trolls feeding trolls. Good luck getting
the ones who reply to agree to ignore him. You'd have better luck getting
him to ignore them!

It is a mistake to judge me based on the infantile and abusive people who
do not know how to behave in an international discussion forum.

From a degree in electronics (Essex 1972) and a software career in the
communications industry, now that
I have retired, I have time to ask questions about those things that puzzled
me 45 years ago.

Amateur radio has technical and gentlemanly traditions which I have spoken
up for consistently
in the 21 years that I have been a subscriber to Usenet and never originate
any personal unpleasantness.

I do not care for controversy, which is why I castigate those, such as
yourself, who feel the
need to resort to personal remarks instead of just joining in a discussion,
or refraining from doing so.

gareth wrote:

"rickman" wrote in message
...
On 9/11/2015 3:11 AM, AndyW wrote:
On 10/09/2015 21:47, rickman wrote:
This group was fairly quiet, even dead, for some time until Gareth made
a few posts designed to stimulate idiocy. I don't know what the man may
know about radio science, but he is a master puppeteer.
In U.R.A. there was a move to just stop replying to his posts,
particularly the baited hooks and it killed a lot of the noise in the
group.
Some of the questions start off interesting but pretty soon descend into
name-calling or cyclical arguements and it is time to leave the thread.
Some of his threads are heading that way already.
It's not just him. He lives for the controversy obviously. But others
here live to give it to him. Trolls feeding trolls. Good luck getting
the ones who reply to agree to ignore him. You'd have better luck getting
him to ignore them!

It is a mistake to judge me based on the infantile and abusive people who
do not know how to behave in an international discussion forum.

From a degree in electronics (Essex 1972) and a software career in the
communications industry, now that
I have retired, I have time to ask questions about those things that puzzled
me 45 years ago.

Amateur radio has technical and gentlemanly traditions which I have spoken
up for consistently
in the 21 years that I have been a subscriber to Usenet and never originate
any personal unpleasantness.

I do not care for controversy, which is why I castigate those, such as
yourself, who feel the
need to resort to personal remarks instead of just joining in a discussion,
or refraining from doing so.

I don't think the word 'controversy' means quite what you think it
means.

--
Roger Hayter

gareth wrote:

never originate
any personal unpleasantness.

Liar.

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!or...r/414fvMWcmSs/
G_g9_4UK9ZUJ

or http://tinyurl.com/p3lj238

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!or...r/uduCFhFcL4E/
7XAW0aC4t6sJ

or http://tinyurl.com/ohjfq66

Does your hypocrisy know no bounds, Gareth Alun "Poison Ivy" Evans?

--
(\_/)
(='.'=) Bunny says: Windows 10? Nein danke!
(")_(")

On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Mike Tomlinson wrote:


gareth wrote:

never originate
any personal unpleasantness.

Liar.

Don't add newsgroups to these feuds. This thread didn't start in
rec.radio.amateur.homebrew, yet you added it when you posted.

Michael

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!or...r/414fvMWcmSs/
G_g9_4UK9ZUJ

or http://tinyurl.com/p3lj238

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!or...r/uduCFhFcL4E/
7XAW0aC4t6sJ

or http://tinyurl.com/ohjfq66

Does your hypocrisy know no bounds, Gareth Alun "Poison Ivy" Evans?

--
(\_/)
(='.'=) Bunny says: Windows 10? Nein danke!
(")_(")

"Michael Black" wrote in message
news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1509112339230.13255@darkstar. example.org...
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
gareth wrote:
never originate
any personal unpleasantness.
Liar.
Don't add newsgroups to these feuds. This thread didn't start in
rec.radio.amateur.homebrew, yet you added it when you posted.

There's no feud, only evidence of a one-sided unilateral mentally sick
obsession on the part of Tomlinson, who crossposts his bile to every NG
that he thinks that I frequent.

I regard him with pity.

On 9/12/2015 3:03 PM, gareth wrote:
"Michael Black" wrote in message
news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1509112339230.13255@darkstar. example.org...
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
gareth wrote:
never originate
any personal unpleasantness.
Liar.
Don't add newsgroups to these feuds. This thread didn't start in
rec.radio.amateur.homebrew, yet you added it when you posted.

There's no feud, only evidence of a one-sided unilateral mentally sick
obsession on the part of Tomlinson, who crossposts his bile to every NG
that he thinks that I frequent.

I regard him with pity.

I pity Michael Black. The infection didn't start in your group, but it
has spread there now!

--

Rick

"gareth" wrote in message
...
"Michael Black" wrote in message
news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1509112339230.13255@darkstar. example.org...
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
gareth wrote:
never originate
any personal unpleasantness.
Liar.
Don't add newsgroups to these feuds. This thread didn't start in
rec.radio.amateur.homebrew, yet you added it when you posted.
There's no feud, only evidence of a one-sided unilateral mentally sick
obsession on the part of Tomlinson, who crossposts his bile to every NG
that he thinks that I frequent.

I am confident that, should I take a peek, that Tomlinson's one-sided
obsession will appear again and again.

On 9/11/2015 6:30 AM, gareth wrote:
snip
I do not care for controversy, which is why I castigate those, such as
yourself, who feel the
need to resort to personal remarks instead of just joining in a discussion,
or refraining from doing so.

Well, I appreciate your desire to avoid controversy and especially your
willingness to breach that standard to correct me.

I would suggest that 99% of your posts would fall under the later of the
two options you list. Just say... nothing.

--

Rick

En el artículo , rickman
escribió:

I would suggest that 99% of your posts would fall under the later of the
two options you list. Just say... nothing.

Oink, flap.

He's just starved of attention again, and like most attention whores,
doesn't care what he has to do to get noticed.

--
(\_/)
(='.'=) Bunny says: Windows 10? Nein danke!
(")_(")