Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ian Jackson" wrote in message ... In message , rickman writes On 9/30/2015 12:57 PM, John S wrote: On 9/30/2015 10:12 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , Jeff writes On 29/09/2015 14:31, Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 9/29/2015 4:40 AM, Jeff wrote: So let's get back to the original question. Was it ever really answered? I think it was made slightly more complicated by the fact that the antenna feedpoint impedance was not purely resistive, but was actually around 20-j130 (at 14 MHz), Was there any advantage in having the coax paralleled (both for 20 ohms resistive, and for 20-j130)? Expanding on the original question.... Antenna feedpoint approximately 20-j130 The ATU drives the antenna through about 15 feet of coax. Assuming that the ATU provides a +j130 conjugate match, does that leave the coax with a SWR of 50/20= 2.5:1? If so, then I will not bother with considering 2 parallel coax. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Parallel to USB Cable | CB | |||
Parallel Lines | Antenna | |||
varicaps in parallel | Homebrew | |||
varicaps in parallel | Homebrew | |||
Parallel runs of coax to antenna | Antenna |