Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/1/2015 11:56 AM, Brian Howie wrote:
In message , John S writes On 10/1/2015 3:29 AM, Brian Howie wrote: In message , Wayne writes "Ian Jackson" wrote in message ... In message , rickman writes On 9/30/2015 12:57 PM, John S wrote: On 9/30/2015 10:12 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , Jeff writes On 29/09/2015 14:31, Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 9/29/2015 4:40 AM, Jeff wrote: So let's get back to the original question. Was it ever really answered? I think it was made slightly more complicated by the fact that the antenna feedpoint impedance was not purely resistive, but was actually around 20-j130 (at 14 MHz), Was there any advantage in having the coax paralleled (both for 20 ohms resistive, and for 20-j130)? A quick model. A vertical antenna about 4.2m long with a wire radius of 0.5mm approximates to what you have . The devil is in the j130 If you use a 1.5uH series L the SWR for the parallel 50ohm line is 1.19: 1 and not a bad match over the band Expanding on the original question.... Antenna feedpoint approximately 20-j130 The ATU drives the antenna through about 15 feet of coax. Assuming that the ATU provides a +j130 conjugate match, does that leave the coax with a SWR of 50/20= 2.5:1? If so, then I will not bother with considering 2 parallel coax. No the line SWR is still about 36:1. If you run a bit of poke, you might melt the coax. If you want a single 50 ohm feed, extend the antenna to 5.7m ( ~50+ j87) and use a series C ~130pf to take out the the +j87. You have to do this at the antenna end. It goes without saying you need a good ground. Brian What do you think of this while leaving his antenna unchanged? 2.3uH ___ '-----o-----UUU--------------- .-. | ^ | | | | 20 | | C| ' '-' C| 4uH | C| 50 ohms | | --- | . -130--- | | | | v '-----o------------------------ (created by AACircuit v1.28.6 beta 04/19/05 www.tech-chat.de) Yes that works too. Lots of ways to do it. Brian Oh, yes of course. I try to avoid capacitors as much as I can because one end can float with static voltage while an inductor does not. I've had issues with nearby static lightning discharges. Just my paranoia. To each his own. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Parallel to USB Cable | CB | |||
Parallel Lines | Antenna | |||
varicaps in parallel | Homebrew | |||
varicaps in parallel | Homebrew | |||
Parallel runs of coax to antenna | Antenna |