Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/16/2015 7:58 AM, gareth wrote:
By their very nature, short antennae are standing wave antennae and not travelling wave antennae. It is possible to have a short traveling wave antenna, yes? If the forward power is absorbed by something at the end rather than reflected, then it is a traveling wave antenna regardless of length. It may be very inefficient, but that is not the issue, is it? Consider the standing wave that is apparent when the incident wave arrives at the open end of the antennae. Okay. It is reflected because the current cannot go beyond the end of the conductor. In the case of at least 1/4 wave antennae, the standing wave exhibits the full quadrant of a cycle, but in the shorter antennae, there is less than a full quadrant, and it follows that because not the full quadrant appears on the antennae, then they do not radiate from that full quadrant. That is not a good reason. The signal reflected from the open end will again be reflected at the feed point and will bounce back and forth until it is emitted. Yes? Do you have any technical or mathematical treatments of your assertion that we can read? Do you have a simulation program? EZNEC is free and you can show to yourself the efficiency of a short antenna. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Short antennae are poor radiators - a simple illustration. | Antenna | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
Short antennae, et al | Antenna | |||
short antennae | Antenna | |||
Short Antennae | Antenna |