Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:34:10 -0400, rickman wrote:
I just read the wikipedia article on small loop antennas and it seems I was laboring under a misapprehension. I thought receiving loops were "magnetic" because they were shielded (this is often stated in various web pages about constructing such loops). But the wikipedia article on small loop antennas says the nature of a small loop is to not be very sensitive to the E field in near field. So if the shield has little to do with rejecting near field electrical noise, what does the shield do? A lot of antenna designs make a big deal of the shield. So I assume it must be a useful addition to the small loop antenna for some purpose. The shielded loop reduces local noise pickup by eliminating much of the electric component of that noise in the near field. Since the ability of a small loop antenna to hear properly is primarily an exercise in improving the SNR, any reduction in noise levle, without a corresponding reduction in signal level, is a very good thing. More detail: http://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/70262/what-if-anything-makes-shielded-loop-antennas-so-great-at-rejecting-local-nois I've built small loops that were not shielded and measure the SNR of some stable signal, such as WWV. I then wrapped the loop in aluminum duct tape, leaving a gap to prevent a shorted turn problem, retuned, and found that the baseline noise level had decreased and the SNR had improved. It works. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
multi-turn magnetic loops | Antenna | |||
To RHF, et al. Re Loops | Shortwave | |||
Magnetic Loops | Antenna | |||
Magnetic Loops and RF Exposure | Antenna | |||
array of magnetic loops? | Antenna |