Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/19/2015 2:14 PM, rickman wrote:
To be a bit simplistic, the amount of signal captured is proportional to the loop area; the number of turns has little to no effect on that. I'm pretty sure that is not correct. The signal strength is proportional to the number of turns *and* the loop area. I will have to dig out my notes on this, but some factors (like Q) even out with various changes in antenna parameters such as number of turns, loop size, etc. But signal strength is proportional to the area of the loop and the number of turns. From http://www.lz1aq.signacor.com/docs/f..._loop_engl.htm E = 2pi w S µR e / λ λ is the wavelength in meters w - the number of ML turns; S – is the area of the windings in m2; μR is the effective magnetic permeability of the ferrite rod SML. μR is always less than the permeability of the material used and depends from the size, geometry and the way the windings are constructed. μR = 1 for aerial loops. The product: А = w μR S (3) is called effective area of the SML. Correct me if I'm wrong, A 1 meter square loop with 5 turns would equal 5 square meters. A = 5 sq. meters. A 2.23 meter x 2.23 meter 1 turn loop would equal 5 square meters. A = 5 sq. meters. A 5 meter x 5 meter 1 turn loop with a series inductor would equal 25 sq. meters. A = 25 Sq. meters. A 5 times increase in A (S) means about a 7db increase in signal strength. (minus losses caused by series inductor) Does that all seem right? Mikek |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
multi-turn magnetic loops | Antenna | |||
To RHF, et al. Re Loops | Shortwave | |||
Magnetic Loops | Antenna | |||
Magnetic Loops and RF Exposure | Antenna | |||
array of magnetic loops? | Antenna |