Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 24th 04, 08:09 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:56:29 +0300, Paul Keinanen
wrote:

Compare this to the nominal 73 ohm radiation resistances for a half
wave dipole and more than half of the transmitter power would be
dissipated in the losses.


Hi Paul,

And still, no one would notice. In fact, I gave the loss 100 Xs
copper, lowered the frequency to 1MHz and saw roughly 6dB loss - the
"standard" S-Unit, against which propagation variations would toss
that around to wider variation. I suppose it wouldn't do for EME, but
I don't know any work at 1MHz for EME.

Still, and all, this determination is easily within the scope of the
free distribution of EZNEC which allows any user to make an informed
decision about a choice being OK.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Free stainless steel 1/4 inch diameter tubes Jerry Martes Antenna 0 June 12th 04 03:25 AM
Adding lengths to bare wire antenna? Ken Antenna 8 May 3rd 04 03:03 PM
Excessive RF Exposure from Long Wire? jj Antenna 22 February 13th 04 10:32 PM
randon wire newbie question lethal Antenna 4 February 7th 04 11:01 AM
Open Wire Feeder Switching Ideas ? DOUGLAS SNOWDEN Antenna 4 December 30th 03 07:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017