Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tam/WB2TT wrote:
Going back to the Slick discussions of last winter, Was that you who made the statement that you can have 100% re reflection from a transmitter, even if it has a 50 Ohm output impedance? At first I thought this was all wet, but after making some low power experiments, I am convinced it is true. It is true by definition. All reflected power incident upon a transmitter is re-reflected, by definition. Never mind that reflected voltage can cause an over-voltage condition and/or reflected current can cause an over-current condition *inside* the transmitter. By definition, any reflected power dissipated in the source after making a round trip to the load was never generated to begin with. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SWR meter kaput? | Antenna | |||
Conjugate matching and my funky VSWR meter | Antenna | |||
10 meter ant impedance at 15 meter | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna |