Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Craig - and if you could, please elaborate on these design
considerations: The antenna is not erected yet - still planning. I would choose a 1:1 balun if I used one at all with an end-fed inverted-L configuration. But if I configure the antenna as a sloper (same L-shape) and top-feed at the angle point, then I thought a 4:1 balun could help make 2182khz tunable on an antenna with dipole properties that is really too short (would have to be 107' each leg not 107' total, which is about all I can get at that location). Of those two choices, I had not intended to use ladderline for either, but would consider it if some benefit was possible. Ideally, the antenna would be desireable to cover 2-20mhz. No compromse on the 2182 end is worth the upper bandwidth though, with 5.7 & 8.9 mhz the other requirements that should not unduly strain a tuner under high tx power. The antenna would be primarily for 2182 - 4125 khz.. Thanks for any help. Jack "Craig Buck" wrote in message news:Y6O%c.7112$OZ6.5222@okepread06... You can go with ladder line right out of the tuner or to a short piece of coax to a balun, then to ladder line. I have about ten feet of coax to a 1:1 balun outside. The coax is easier to get out of the house and away from things that might unbalance the ladder line. Loss on such a short piece of coax is negligible even at high SWRs on HF. Whether you use a 4:1 or 1:1 depends on the antenna and feedline. I use a 1:1. Your antenna will be the "right" length so the impedance at the transmitter end won't be too far off from 70 ohms. A 4:1 balun would be a mistake as it would lower the impedance making it harder to match the transmitter. I have to ask, "Why are you using ladder line?" Usually it is only used when the antenna has a high SWR and we want to avoid losses in the coax. You won't have much of a mismatch, if any. I would think you would go with coax, you might not even need a tuner. -- Radio K4ia Craig "Buck" Fredericksburg, VA USA FISTS 6702 cc 788 Diamond 64 "Jack Painter" wrote in message news:UuM%c.173651$Lj.145677@fed1read03... "Craig Buck" wrote I use a top center fed L. One side is horizontal and the other side is vertical. Fed at the top center with ladder line. Cebik has several articles on his site about center fed Ls. No ground plane, horizontal and vertical polarization, fewer nulls in the pattern. Very nice I think the center feds make a lot more sense for multiband operation. -- Radio K4ia Craig "Buck" Fredericksburg, VA USA FISTS 6702 cc 788 Diamond 64 Hi Craig, is that fed with ladder line right out of the tuner? I'm hoping there is a best-fit arangement from my tuner to an inverted-L with either a top-fed through a 4:1 balun or end-fed without a balun. In either case the intention is to cover 2182khz with a 107' 1/4~ L. Any suggestions on the best arrangement for that work? Thanks, Jack Virginia Beach VA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ladder line construction methods? | Antenna | |||
ladder line recommendations? | Antenna | |||
Ladder line question ???? | Antenna | |||
Ladder Line or Coax For Reception only? | Antenna | |||
Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna |