LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
Old September 20th 04, 03:35 PM
Richard Harrison
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jack Painter wrote:
"Overall, there appears to be no effect on the antenna being in fairly
close proximity to many tall trees, and suspended from them."

That was the Signal Corps conclusion for horizontal polarization at HF.
For vertical polarization, surrounding trees are better energy
absorbers. At VHF and UHF, absorption gets worse and worse as frequency
goes up. Too much foliage is impenetrable at VHF and UHF, regardless of
polarization, humidity, ice, snow and wind.

The Signal Corps advises trying horizontal HF antennas among the trees
to avoid detection by the enemy.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
FS: Larsen KD150HW 2 meter half wave for handheld Homer Antenna 0 April 7th 04 01:06 AM
vertical dipole? Desmoface Antenna 25 January 16th 04 12:20 AM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017