Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack Painter wrote:
"Overall, there appears to be no effect on the antenna being in fairly close proximity to many tall trees, and suspended from them." That was the Signal Corps conclusion for horizontal polarization at HF. For vertical polarization, surrounding trees are better energy absorbers. At VHF and UHF, absorption gets worse and worse as frequency goes up. Too much foliage is impenetrable at VHF and UHF, regardless of polarization, humidity, ice, snow and wind. The Signal Corps advises trying horizontal HF antennas among the trees to avoid detection by the enemy. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
FS: Larsen KD150HW 2 meter half wave for handheld | Antenna | |||
vertical dipole? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |