**** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

"Richard Clark"
Of course a Lot Of Crazy [Dogs]
will then bluster in outrage that
IR is not light.

No I would not - you're totally wrong.

BUT...

I would happily remind you or anyone else to pay attention to the word
VISIBLE, as in visible light, when you, or y'all, clearly neglected to pay
sufficient attention (DARPA and all that IR sub-thread) to the exact
contents of the CNN article and my previous postings (all of which were
perfectly clear).

See the diff ?

Furthermore, you're (intentionally?) ignoring my previous Position
Statement: "I'm as in favour of the fundamental sameness of light to radio
waves as anyone." Given IR's position in the spectrum, you can easily
derive how I feel about its nature.

Your comment (top) was unfair - almost mean.

sniff -- ;-)




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
*** Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! ***
http://www.usenet.com
Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=