| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Inventor) Bob's (W1XYZ) patents on this form a basis for ownership on such
varieties of antennas, within the construct of the claims. That is my opinion. The fact that later academic groups allegedly claim discovery or invention on this or other new technologies is irrelevant: the assignee of he patent is what's important. It is common for academic groups to be 5-20 years behind the state of the art in antenna work BTW. The CNN story is a nice corroboration of Bob's innovation and invention, in my opinion. Of course, it wouldn't hurt to give the man some well-deserved credit. Again, this is also a fairly common problem in some academic groups these days, unfortunately. Hat's off, Bob. 73, Chip N1IR |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||