Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
**** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
"Fractenna" The patent is the only thing that matters in such new technology. Yawn... Oh sorry... Look - anyone could 'patent' going into space in a cheap, reusable rocket like 'this' and like 'that'. What makes the evening news is when someone actually DOES it. Same thing for 'light antennas' - who did it first (couldn't care less who happened to apply for a patent if they didn't actually DO it). When they changed the definition of 'reduction to practice' from 'send a working model' to 'just write it down', the whole patent system became a lawyers' game and a work of fiction in many cases. BTW, here's today's trivia question. Carbon 14 dating is a mainstay for setting ages of things a few thousands of years old. Who--invented--it? Perhaps someone patented it in 1920. The decay of Carbon-14 and it's relationship to cosmic rays, the atmosphere, life and death is a natural phenomenon. It wasn't really 'invented' (except by God and/or Nature), it was discovered (or developed) by W.F. Libby. According to Encyclopedia Britannica 2003 Deluxe CD edition (oh so cool for $10): "The carbon-14 method was developed by the American physicist Willard F. Libby about 1946." "...he and his students developed the carbon-14 dating technique." "[He] wrote Radiocarbon Dating (1952)." "For this development he was honoured with the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1960." From the WWW: "In 1960, Libby was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for leading the team (namely, post-doc James Arnold and graduate student Ernie Anderson, with a $5,000 grant) that developed Carbon-14 dating." "Martin Kamen discovered [Carbon-14] in 1940 in collaboration with the late Sam Ruben, a University of California, Berkeley chemist, while the two were working at the 60-inch cyclotron at the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory." Do you know something the rest of the world doesn't? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= *** Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |