On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:44:12 -0700, "Chuck"
wrote:

[snip]
|
|Perhaps you should argue this with
|Dr. Ken Asmus, VA3KA , a scientist who
|conducted a shoot-out in Canada...

I'm sure that Dr. Asmus is a fine fellow, all-around good guy and he
no longer beats his wife. But the minute I hear, "the RB-36x was 1-2
S units stronger", science has gone out the window and bafflegab has
blown in.

[snip]
|
|It seems inconsistent that you repeatedly
|cry "unsubstantiated" then refuse to
|consider substance. Though I suppose
|if you bothered to check out the contest
|records, it may raise havoc with your
|unsubstantiated opinions, perhaps?... hi

Contest records are not "substance."

Comparative measurements on a calibrated antenna range would be
substance. I will consider them.

SK

N7WS