On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 23:27:29 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:

That is because Neo-Con's are a mutant form of liberal. Kind of like
liberals that have drank waaay too much coffee and turned mean! 8^)

But they are still liberals.

Hi Mike,

You and I are probably the only two to understand that point, but when
a right-winger who's been hood-winked into taking them into their
fold.... They will swallow a lot of swill and proclaim it Champagne
before admitting the lie. After-all, the pay off is so rewarding when
the neocons leave the financial tap running for them (helps the swill
go down).

We need only look at Nader embracing the only group that would carry
him into elections and they are the resurrection of the American Nazi
party.

Now there's a principle of reciprocity that is truly comic.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 23:27:29 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:


That is because Neo-Con's are a mutant form of liberal. Kind of like
liberals that have drank waaay too much coffee and turned mean! 8^)

But they are still liberals.


Hi Mike,

You and I are probably the only two to understand that point, but when
a right-winger who's been hood-winked into taking them into their
fold.... They will swallow a lot of swill and proclaim it Champagne
before admitting the lie.

There's the one about Yellow Dog Democrats and Second Coming
Republicans... There are some Democrats that would vote for a yellow dog
before voting Republican, and some Republicans that wouldn't vote for a
Democrat if he came down from heaven to trumpet blasts from a heavenly
host! 8^)

After-all, the pay off is so rewarding when
the neocons leave the financial tap running for them (helps the swill
go down).

But the bills always come due, don't they?


We need only look at Nader embracing the only group that would carry
him into elections and they are the resurrection of the American Nazi
party.

Dunno if you heard the debate between Howard Dean and Ralphie boy. Now
THAT is what a debate is supposed to be. Dean was pretty civil for the
first part, and Nadar actually wasn't boring. But when Dean brought up
Ralph's dubious buddies, it turned really exciting!

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 23:19:50 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:
Dunno if you heard the debate between Howard Dean and Ralphie boy. Now
THAT is what a debate is supposed to be. Dean was pretty civil for the
first part, and Nadar actually wasn't boring. But when Dean brought up
Ralph's dubious buddies, it turned really exciting!

Hi Mike,

That is like watching grannies mud wrestle yawn

My best view of a debate was during the '68 election cycle, CBS news,
Democratic Convention, ringside color commentators by Bill Buckley and
Gore Vidal.

On network TV, coast to coast all day coverage (or maybe it only felt
like it), limited channels (the only game on the tube) and if looks
could kill, the space between them would have run redder than Cambodia
swimming in blood (waiting for Kissinger to spring that genocide).

They parried back and forth in verbal jousts and Gore upped the ante
by calling Bill a Crypto-Fascist. Bill sprang across the coffee table
between them and tried to throttle him. The moderator was so
surprised he watched them struggle on the floor. A quick knee to the
groin would have settled it post-haste, but neither had anything to
lose.

Today we get candy-asses like Buchasneer and Limabean who couldn't
fight a swish with his limp wrists tied behind his back. :-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:

Today we get candy-asses like Buchasneer and Limabean who couldn't
fight a swish with his limp wrists tied behind his back. :-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

I would suggest you stick to what you are expert at, nitpicking EM,
rather than what you aren't good at, which is attempting to be being cute.

tom K0TAR

On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:57:04 -0500, Tom Ring
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:

Today we get candy-asses like Buchasneer and Limabean who couldn't
fight a swish with his limp wrists tied behind his back. :-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

I would suggest you stick to what you are expert at, nitpicking EM,
rather than what you aren't good at, which is attempting to be being cute.

tom K0TAR

And you are Shirley Temple? No doubt I stepped on your fat icons
pudgy toes and those oinkers squeeled Ossama. :-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:


And you are Shirley Temple? No doubt I stepped on your fat icons
pudgy toes and those oinkers squeeled Ossama. :-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

I _do_ have her hair.

tom
K0TAR