I'm not at all insisting on your testing your antenna -- I have no need
to. NEC-2 and EZNEC are perfectly capable of accurately modeling it, and
accurately show the gain and pattern it will have in practice. Its
operation is simple and easily understandable. I'm entirely satisfied
that I understand how it works and what its performance is.

My offer, which I think was generous, was to pay the bill if a test
showed your antenna to meet the claims you made. I'm not offering to
test your antenna for you. You've once again chosen to fall back on your
back yard test and creative pseudo-scientific theory to explain the
claims you've made, rather than to show the world, at no expense to you,
that the claims are valid. That's up to you. I'm not obligated to
disprove your extraordinary claims.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

chuck wrote:
Chuck wrote:

Roy Lewallen wrote in message
...


Because you never furnished that information, I assumed that you had
acquired it illicitly.



I recall (I must take his word for it) that party
informed you of the transfer, while assuring
you that any or all copies were destroyed.

Perhaps you overlooked making a record.
In any case, I'll email his callsign.


Allowing say 30 days or so for me to
prepare an antenna, I invite you to make
the arrangements in Tucson - say April -
May, 2005 or so - and I will be more
than happy to join you there.

Is this agreeable?

No, you'll have to make the arrangements.


Considering you are the one insisting on this, I do not
agree to do that. However, I do agree to have the test
fee held in an escrow account set up by my attorney,
but the rest is up tp you.



The person who pays will have the legal
right to make the results public. I agree in advance to do so if I pay;
I expect you to do likewise.


Of course!

Chuck, WA7RAI


Roy Lewallen, W7EL