| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:10:01 -0300, "Bob MacBeth"
wrote: Someone going by 'Bob': Someone has to produce an example. "Richard Clark" ...I've done that here through modeling too using exactly your point. The results were trivial, but for some, extremely hard to swallow. [**] ;-) Can you clarify your findings (please and thank you)? Were you able to find an antenna system (pair) that displayed direction-dependant pathloss? I've use EZNEC to demonstrate any number of "impossibilities" all without violating or compromising the modeler's constraints. The effects were trivial to say the least, but demonstrated that Axioms of antenna theory had limitations that were unexpressed (until you got to the graduate level of the same sophomore course work). Since you can't prove a negative and I know that you know it, I assume that you did. If so, perhaps you could post the example on your website. Well, it has been a great while in this particular instance of path reciprocity. I did use the scale of range you suggested (and perhaps further). It was not so much about loss however, but the failure of reciprocity (a common topic in photography - which, here, is an aside). I frequently use two or three antennas in one model, with the second/third being receive models with termination resistors. They would be called sniffers in field work or bench work. This work that I engaged in had no particular demonstration of your curved field issue (which, through simple abstraction suggests any differences you would observe would be out several decimal places and beyond the ability of any instrumentation to resolve with accuracy). Then again, maybe it did (it may have involved an inclined sniffer which demonstrated the curvature in one direction, with a corresponding difference in the other). I would suggest you simply follow this last speculation and see where it takes you. I suppose you could search the archives for my name and the key words of "reciprocity failure" and confine the search to the mid to late 90s. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |