Things are looking up. Instead of patently false statements, you've
advanced to musings that simply make no sense. Since most readers will
hopefully recognize them for what they are, no response is necessary.
Actually, no rational response is even possible.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Chuck wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote in message
...
[... ]

I clearly stated in an earlier posting that EZNEC implements the
extended thick-wire kernel as required by the model. (The thin-wire
kernel is the default.)


Hi Roy,

For clarity, let it be established that the
term "wire kernel" and "wire model" (the
term used in the NEC2d documentation) will
be considered as one and the same in this
discussion.

That said, I find it extremely hard to believe
that the wire model used for interconnecting tx
lines, which normally would be implemented
only in the special case of unbalanced
terminations, and one that uses the most
resources, would be designated as the
default wire model. It defies all logic.

When asked what criteria your program uses
to determine which wire model to implement,
and why it is not a choice the user can make
- as it should be - you responded with a rather
paranoid and pejorative diatribe attacking my
character... what am I supposed to assume
from that?

In any event, these were honest questions
which you chose to evade, and continue to do
so. All things considered, it is easy to make
the assumption that the thin-wire model is not
implemented in EZNEC, and you're simply
trying to spin your way out of a hole.

Shame on you!

73 de Chuck, WA7RAI